Satisfaction is matched, however, by concern about the McDonald’s at the Pantheon: “we would like to express a similar judgment for the no less serious matter of a new McDonald’s at the side of the Pantheon, a threat instead still looming. In Florence, the City Council successfully opposed the opening of a McDonald’s in Piazza Duomo. Why is the same not happening in Rome for a place of such absolute prestige as the Pantheon? The quality of urban decorum has deteriorated throughout Italy, but in Rome it appears more conspicuous, and this also damages economically the image of the Eternal City, which absolutely must not be ”Americanized.“ We are being asked by foreigners and Italians who love Rome, its identity, ancient and modern.”
Finally, Signorini, Paris and Emiliani believe that "the debate ignited over the case-Mc Drive and the protection of the historic city, differentiated from the state protection reserved for the historic centers of Lazio, should lead the Ministry of Cultural Heritage to draw up in agreement with the Capitol a General Plan of constraints, covering the whole 'city of Nathan' without gaps or gaps. And together an Urban Decor Plan, invoked in vain for forty years."
Italia Nostra: "Good MiBAC saving Caracalla from McDonald's, but we risk having another one at the Pantheon" |
Warning: the translation into English of the original Italian article was created using automatic tools. We undertake to review all articles, but we do not guarantee the total absence of inaccuracies in the translation due to the program. You can find the original by clicking on the ITA button. If you find any mistake,please contact us.